trAvis - MANAGER
Edit File: run_time_role_composition.t
#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; use Test::More; use Scalar::Util qw(blessed); =pod This test can be used as a basis for the runtime role composition. Apparently it is not as simple as just making an anon class. One of the problems is the way that anon classes are DESTROY-ed, which is not very compatible with how instances are dealt with. =cut { package Bark; use Moose::Role; sub talk { 'woof' } package Sleeper; use Moose::Role; sub sleep { 'snore' } sub talk { 'zzz' } package My::Class; use Moose; sub sleep { 'nite-nite' } } my $obj = My::Class->new; isa_ok($obj, 'My::Class'); my $obj2 = My::Class->new; isa_ok($obj2, 'My::Class'); { ok(!$obj->can( 'talk' ), "... the role is not composed yet"); ok(!$obj->does('Bark'), '... we do not do any roles yet'); Bark->meta->apply($obj); ok($obj->does('Bark'), '... we now do the Bark role'); ok(!My::Class->does('Bark'), '... the class does not do the Bark role'); isa_ok($obj, 'My::Class'); isnt(blessed($obj), 'My::Class', '... but it is no longer blessed into My::Class'); ok(!My::Class->can('talk'), "... the role is not composed at the class level"); ok($obj->can('talk'), "... the role is now composed at the object level"); is($obj->talk, 'woof', '... got the right return value for the newly composed method'); } { ok(!$obj2->does('Sleeper'), '... we do not do any roles yet'); Sleeper->meta->apply($obj2); ok($obj2->does('Sleeper'), '... we now do the Sleeper role'); isnt(blessed($obj), blessed($obj2), '... they DO NOT share the same anon-class/role thing'); } { is($obj->sleep, 'nite-nite', '... the original method responds as expected'); ok(!$obj->does('Sleeper'), '... we do not do the Sleeper role'); Sleeper->meta->apply($obj); ok($obj->does('Bark'), '... we still do the Bark role'); ok($obj->does('Sleeper'), '... we now do the Sleeper role too'); ok(!My::Class->does('Sleeper'), '... the class does not do the Sleeper role'); isnt(blessed($obj), blessed($obj2), '... they still don\'t share the same anon-class/role thing'); isa_ok($obj, 'My::Class'); is(My::Class->sleep, 'nite-nite', '... the original method still responds as expected'); is($obj->sleep, 'snore', '... got the right return value for the newly composed method'); is($obj->talk, 'zzz', '... got the right return value for the newly composed method'); } { ok(!$obj2->does('Bark'), '... we do not do Bark yet'); Bark->meta->apply($obj2); ok($obj2->does('Bark'), '... we now do the Bark role'); isnt(blessed($obj), blessed($obj2), '... they still don\'t share the same anon-class/role thing'); } # test that anon classes are equivalent after role composition in the same order { foreach ($obj, $obj2) { $_ = My::Class->new; Bark->meta->apply($_); Sleeper->meta->apply($_); } is(blessed($obj), blessed($obj2), '... they now share the same anon-class/role thing'); } done_testing;